Im not gonna try to start another KA vs. SR fight. Im just saying you should do a little more research before saying that the SR is a more solid engine. From all the information I've collected, there very much respectively equal in their flaws. While they both still have their strong points, It is unfare to just automatically say "get the SR, its better" (quoting loosely). Yes its a exhaustedly known fact that the SR has a stronger performance market following over the KA. But, just because there are more parts available, doesnt mean its automatically better. Hell, look at the Civic and Integra, they have the largest aftermarket following in the US, does it make them the best cars out there? no, not by a long shot. But the fact is, the companies cater to the needs of the customer. If the 240SX had blown up in popularity when it first came out, with the KA, then I know that we would have a hell of alot more performance parts for the "truck engine". But people are stupid and unoriginal so they follow the crowd adn just do what the other guy did because they know it worked. I dont know what im really trying to say, mainly because im drunk, but all Im gonna say is this. RESEARCH EVERYTHING!! And figure out what you want. If you decide to get the SR, cool. or do a KA-T, aight. RB? im happy for you. Or hell, some psycho Rotary of boxer engine swap or whatever. DOIT! IT all boils down to what you like and what your needs are.
Me? Imma stick with my KA's and go pull a stump or 2.