what kind of times are you running? is the car still in stock trim, ie no weight reductions? are you running the stock sr tranny or the ve tranny? someone mentions the n1 tranny is stronger than the de tranny with shorter gears. is there fabricating to get that trans to work? what axles, wiring, and ecu are you running?98sr20ve said:I have 180whp with a VE and a CAI/Header/Exhaust. Redline at 7700rpm and HP peak at 7200 rpm. Same torque as the sr20de. New cams in a couple weeks should net me 192+whp.
i was told the n1 tranny has maxima gears stuffed into it. which hydr tranny are you refering to, the spec v 6 speed? there is talk of jwt releasing a kit to install that(6 speed) into all 200's and sentras with cable trannys. the only down side is the cable linkage.98sr20ve said:This is not a 1/4 mile car. Formost it is an autocross car. With the car wieghing 2485 it ran a 14.6 @95 or so mph. I have yet to get a good launch with this car. Stock 97 tranny with a quaife, JWT ECU, CAI, Headers, Exhaust. The N1 tranny that is cable operatted is not any stronger then the regular tranny (from what I have been told), It's the Hydralic tranny that is stronger.
that shouldnt be too hard to fabricate as long as the block matches up and the input shaft is the same. i wouldnt want to mess with the bell housings but if its just the hydr-clutch and linkage it should be a snap. one of my friends has a h22 prelude motor in his 90 civic hatch, that tranny is hydo vs the stock cable and all he did is use a break master cyln to drive the hydrolics on the throw out bearing. now, my questions is how much stronger is it than a stock sr20de tranny and would it be worth the hassle?98sr20ve said:. The cable shift one is off the 2001 VE (I think 2001) and is a bolt up to the block but requires work for the linkage and clutch. It is also a 6 speed.
