Re: Answers
Yes, the SR20 would be the best bang for the buck. My only problem is that I have a fairly new Reman'd engine and Rebuilt auto tranny and all the NA bolt-ons except for cams & ecu (JWT ECU Upgrade - $1300 for my car). I'm still paying off that engine and transmission, kinda pricey for a warranty.
I'm glad to see the work you're doing to the GA16. Those JWT cams, do they have enough duration for turbo or are they made for the most part for NA? I only ask that question because of what some of the people have been telling me around here. They said, with most aftermarket cams the intake valves and the exhaust valves overlap and if you put turbo on it, it could actually suck in some heat into the motor and then cause detonation. Is this true?wes said:DHO, iF $$$ is an issue go turbo, you will get more bang for your buck! The other questions do not have any concrete answers, no one has pursued that route with a GA16 yet.
My project is shaping up. New ported head has been installed along with the JWT cams. I just need to button up the manifolds and break in the cams. Stay tuned to NPM for the results of the project!
Syndicate- Yes the timing chain and main bearings can withstand that! CHEF has achieved 200 WHP on his turbo GA16, while many others have been running nitrous for a LONG time without any problems. Bob Legere built Tim Mathers rally GA16 and that thing runs like a raped ape. The question that needs to be asked is what your goals are. My goal is to explore the limits of the 1.6 and see how much power I can extract out of it.
If your goal is ultimate power and bang for the buck, an SR20 is a better starting point and will produce more power for less $$$.
Yes, the SR20 would be the best bang for the buck. My only problem is that I have a fairly new Reman'd engine and Rebuilt auto tranny and all the NA bolt-ons except for cams & ecu (JWT ECU Upgrade - $1300 for my car). I'm still paying off that engine and transmission, kinda pricey for a warranty.