89Joe

Does anyone know the performance specs for the NON-TURBO? I have this old stat sheet from Motor Trend - 1997 and they tested a '91 2+2 model as follows: 0-60 = 7.5sec and ran the 1/4 mile in 15.9@89.5mph. That sucks! Please tell me that this was just a bad day or a couple of typos. I need at least a 6sec sprint to 60mph and a 14sec quarter at 100mph at the bare minimum! Any info is appreciated. Thanx!

__________________
FORCED to own/drive a 93 Honda Accord - automatic (YUK!) for the time being. Nissan replacement on the way! FINALLY - as of 08/10/06 I'm back in the game! '95 G20t 5spd..blk/blk

MGBRaceman

7.5 to 8 is to be expected for the non turbo. 3300 Lbs with 180 horses.

__________________
I am Iridium V.

BORNGEARHEAD

180 hp???? No, 222hp.

__________________
93 NX2000 w/sr20ve
98 Frontier

UpChuck

When C/D tested the 91 SE-R, its 0-60 time was 7.3 and 1/4 was 15.7(?)

But R&T tested the same car, and got 8.1 and 16.2. They also tested an NX2000, 8.1 and 16.6. This is practically the same car, if anything the NX should be faster thru the 1/4. (Unless it was an auto. But why test that?)
See where im going? I wouldnt put a whole lot of faith in one magazine article.

But if you are looking for those kind of times, you need the TT.

__________________
91 SE-R DET :D --> Still have it.
99 SE-L :( --> intake = stock. what a turd. ill handling, slow, and fugly.

Henry8866

it runs low 15's