Today Clark went to work on the ECU and did some tuning for the C6M cams. The result is 200.4 whp @ 7800 rpm. I think this is perhaps the most powerful NA DE around that is well documented. Not bad for a low buck motor.
He also spun the engine to 8600 rpm on the dyno with no valve float or rocker arm jump off. Theoreticaly these cams should be good to 9200 rpm with no float. The rods did not fly apart either!
Tomarrow Clark is going to fiddle with the intake cam timing to try to get some of the torque lost by the big cams and next week we try Pete's new manifold and a 70mm TB. We will probably end up with a good solid 200's.
I think I'll proably end up going back to the C3's with the manifold to get midrange torque and more than 200 hp, unless the cam really responds to more advance. We can't run the optimal lobe centers because the stock and 300ZX pistons don't have enough piston to valve clearance so piston with deep valve relifes will proably produce more torque.
Mr Miko needs to get his big bore motor, going we are going to see 220 with that one.
Mike
__________________
There can only be one Icy Hot Stunta, Don't Hate.
Today Clark went to work on the ECU and did some tuning for the C6M cams. The result is 200.4 whp @ 7800 rpm. I think this is perhaps the most powerful NA DE around that is well documented. Not bad for a low buck motor.
He also spun the engine to 8600 rpm on the dyno with no valve float or rocker arm jump off. Theoreticaly these cams should be good to 9200 rpm with no float. The rods did not fly apart either!
Tomarrow Clark is going to fiddle with the intake cam timing to try to get some of the torque lost by the big cams and next week we try Pete's new manifold and a 70mm TB. We will probably end up with a good solid 200's.
I think I'll proably end up going back to the C3's with the manifold to get midrange torque and more than 200 hp, unless the cam really responds to more advance. We can't run the optimal lobe centers because the stock and 300ZX pistons don't have enough piston to valve clearance so piston with deep valve relifes will proably produce more torque.
Mr Miko needs to get his big bore motor, going we are going to see 220 with that one.
Mike
That's what I like to see!!!!! Interested to see the numbers with teh new Manifold and TB. Any chance your gonna post a dyno chart? Curious to check it out....
That's what I like to see!!!!! Interested to see the numbers with teh new Manifold and TB. Any chance your gonna post a dyno chart? Curious to check it out....
I'll do it when I am done if someone can scan it for me.
Mike
__________________
There can only be one Icy Hot Stunta, Don't Hate.
Today Clark went to work on the ECU and did some tuning for the C6M cams. The result is 200.4 whp @ 7800 rpm. I think this is perhaps the most powerful NA DE around that is well documented. Not bad for a low buck motor.
He also spun the engine to 8600 rpm on the dyno with no valve float or rocker arm jump off. Theoreticaly these cams should be good to 9200 rpm with no float. The rods did not fly apart either!
Tomarrow Clark is going to fiddle with the intake cam timing to try to get some of the torque lost by the big cams and next week we try Pete's new manifold and a 70mm TB. We will probably end up with a good solid 200's.
I think I'll proably end up going back to the C3's with the manifold to get midrange torque and more than 200 hp, unless the cam really responds to more advance. We can't run the optimal lobe centers because the stock and 300ZX pistons don't have enough piston to valve clearance so piston with deep valve relifes will proably produce more torque.
Mr Miko needs to get his big bore motor, going we are going to see 220 with that one.