asleepz

It's the black 300ZX http://photobucket.com/albums/v459/skdtech/

__________________
1987 300ZX Turbo, 5 Speed, TurboXS H-34 BOV, WAI,
Under Construction
Clutch, Wheels, Tint, Paint, Interior, HID

sicksilver99

btw there was a 92 240sx with a catback exhaust that beat a stock 93 300zx down at the saturday night drag races near me

__________________
<click here to see car> mods- cat back exhaust, driving lights, sony xplod stereo, audiobahn 10" subs, sylvania silverstars/ future mods- custom cold air intake, timing advance, amp for subs, headers

Biscuit

I would have to say that the 240 is faster because it looks more aerodynamic.

__________________
Using the Force since 1989!!

Token Moron

LOLOL, you CANT be serious..


so just because a car "looks" more aerodynamic than the next, its faster? or it should be faster? please explain!

__________________
91 se-r : sr20det= the beast
96 sentra : ga16de= pimpness
00 frontier : ka24de= tow truck
01 sentra : gq18de= stock mofo

Biscuit

Well it could be a fact. Just think about it. If you got the same motor, and one car that isnt very aerodynamic and one that is very aerodynamic then I would suppose it would be faster. Does everybody remember the Charger Daytona with the cool ass nose on it and the wing that was winnin lots of races in nascar. Or at least thats what i heard hell i dunno. I was really trying to get you people fired up bout aerodynamics lol.

__________________
Using the Force since 1989!!

wildmanee

That's only if they had the same whp.. same tire and wheel set-up, same everything, except for the car..

Asleep

stock for stock the altima is faster. my brother has a 93 240 (which will be mine at the end of the month ) with full 3 inch exhaust, header, intake, msd, nitrous and my car has all the same things and by 100mph hes about a half car behind me. you cant really compare the two vehicles. one is fwd the other is rwd. two different platforms, two different suspensions, the engines are close but even they have their differences. some of the 240 guys like altima exhaust cams to make more power. one is also 2 dr while the other is 4. the altima weighs about 2900 and the 240 around 24-25 but dont quote me, im recalling from memory. 2 very different cars with 2 very different attitudes.

__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/id/our rides

mzanubis

dang, asleep closed the book on that one.

__________________
Somebody hand me some tupperware, cuz with all this rice, were going to have leftovers
Click it. You know you wanna. Its something cool!

Biscuit

And we have chose our verdict...

__________________
Using the Force since 1989!!

sicksilver99

but thats not stock for stock like he said its with mods

__________________
<click here to see car> mods- cat back exhaust, driving lights, sony xplod stereo, audiobahn 10" subs, sylvania silverstars/ future mods- custom cold air intake, timing advance, amp for subs, headers

Asleep

stock for stock an altima is faster. mods for mods being exactly the same as in my bros and my case - altima wins again.

__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/id/our rides

bobstaxi

Year Make & Model (0-60) (1/4 Mile)
_____ _________________________________ ______ __________
1977 Datsun 200SX 14.6 20.8
1985 Nissan 200SX Turbo 9.5 16.9
1995 Nissan 200SX SE-R 8.2 16.4
1997 Nissan 200SX SE-R 7.8 16.1
1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.5
1990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.5
1991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.1
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.3
1993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.3
1995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.3 16.1
1995 Nissan 240SX SE-R 8.0 15.8
1970 Datsun 240Z 8.7 17.1
1971 Datsun 240Z (Auto) 10.4 17.6
1971 Datsun 240Z N/A 17.1
1972 Datsun 240Z 9.0 16.3
1974 Datsun 260Z 9.9 16.7
1983 Datsun 280ZX 9.4 16.9
1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo 7.3 15.7
1985 Nissan 300ZX 8.2 16.4
1985 Nissan 300ZX Turbo (auto) 7.4 15.7
1987 Nissan 300ZX 2+2 8.8 16.5
1989 Nissan 300ZX 7.1 15.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX 7.1 15.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 6.5 15.0
1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo 5.6 14.1
1991 Nissan 300ZX 2+2 7.5 15.9
1991 Nissan 300ZX Turbo(auto) 7.0 15.4
1992 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 5.7 14.2
1993 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 5.2 13.8
1994 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 6.0 14.4
1995 Nissan 300ZX Turbo 5.5 13.9
1971 Datsun 510 2dr 8.7 17.1
1973 Datsun 610 15.1 19.5
1974 Datsun B210 sedan 17.9 19.7
1974 Datsun B210 2-door Hatchback 22.6 24.8
1974 Datsun 610 N/A 19.3
1974 Datsun 710 13.4 18.6
1975 Datsun B210 17.8 20.8
1976 Datsun B210 (4spd) 17.2 21.2
1976 Datsun B210 (5spd) 17.4 20.8
1977 Datsun 810 12.1 18.0
1967 Datsun 2000 Sports 10.2 17.3
1968 Datsun 1600 Sports 13.3 19.9
1973 Datsun 1200 16.5 19.6
1993 Nissan Altima SE 8.2 16.4
1993 Nissan Altima GXE (auto) 9.6 17.2
1994 Nissan Altima GXE 9.4 16.9
1998 Nissan Altima 8.2 16.4
1976 Datsun F-10 14.2 20.4
1985 Nissan Maxima SE 8.6 16.7
1989 Nissan Maxima SE 8.9 16.9
1992 Nissan Maxima SE 7.3 15.7
1994 Nissan Maxima SE (auto) 8.8 16.7
1995 Nissan Maxima SE 7.4 15.7
1997 Nissan Maxima SE 7.1 15.5
1991 Nissan NX 2000 7.8 16.1
1993 Nissan NX 1600 9.9 17.3
1983 Nissan Pulsar NX 12.8 18.8
1989 Nissan Pulsar NX SE 10.3 17.8
1983 Nissan Sentra XE Hatchback 15.0 19.9
1987 Nissan Sentra 11.8 18.6
1987 Nissan Sentra SE Sport Coupe 13.3 19.0
1992 Nissan Sentra SE-R 8.1 16.2
1993 Nissan Sentra SE-R 7.6 15.8
1994 Nissan Sentra SE-R 7.4 15.8
1995 Nissan Sentra GLE 11.0 18.1
1995 Nissan Sentra GXE 9.6 17.3
1982 Nissan Stanza 11.3 18.2

__________________
3 in the back 2 if your fat

James

What's a 240sx SER?

__________________
05 Frontier SE CC 4x4 (6spd)
Manual Swap Parts!!! Magnaflow Muffer For Sale

sunnydet90

lol was wondering that same thing

__________________
car cost=$500 total parts cost so far=$4750+

SerDaRat93

Okay i read it all and most of the replys were from 240 owners... well take something from an altima owner 2000 altima, i have drove a 93 240sx and to compare it to mine hands down i say the 240 falling short. what makes it better is you can shove 3 fat guys in the back of my altima try that with a 240sx.