» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   NissanForums.com :: Nissan Forum > Nissan Models > Sentra, Pulsar, NX, B14 200SX > GA16DE 1.6L Engine
Register Home Forum Gallery Active Topics Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

GA16DE 1.6L Engine Engine Discussion: 91-99 Sentra, 95-98 200SX, 91-93 NX1600

       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 9th, 2006, 11:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
oliverr87
Nissan Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 339
Send a message via AIM to oliverr87 Send a message via MSN to oliverr87 Send a message via Yahoo to oliverr87
Article: Why a 2.5" MAF to TB pipe is better than a 3" for a CAI

Hi, I have here a small article that I wrote myself on why a 2.5" MAF to TB pipe is better than a 3" pipe. If there are any corrections that need to be done, point them out please. Opinions wanted, thanks!




Why a 2.5" MAF to TB pipe is better than a 3" for a CAI

Cold air intakes allow for greater fuel efficiency, and greater performance. The theory is that if cold air enters the combustion chamber, it will ignite cleaner and bigger because of the greater mass cold air has than warm/hot air. But what happens if you use a 3" pipe from the MAF to throttle body instead of the stock sizing of 2.5"?

Obviously Nissan has done their work on the intake side. On the GA16DE engine, the air intake is designed to produce a 'ram-air' effect. The housing box which stores the filter has a velocity stack that is 3". But go from the MAF to the throttle body, it is reduced to 2.5". Why do you say they did that? They wanted to increase the VELOCITY of the air coming in. Think about it this way. It sort of acts like a compressor. It compresses the air, making it rush in faster, and also somewhat cooling itself because it is not effected by external temperatures.

If the pipe from the MAF to throttle body is INCREASED to 3", this negates the effects of the cold air intake. Sure, you are sucking in 'outside' air (I say outside because it is not cold anymore due to the piping), but it will not be as cold if the air were 'compressed' with the 2.5" pipe. This is the reason why. The pipe from filter to MAF is 3", which houses the cold air. If the pipe from the MAF to the throttle body is also 3", it negates the effects of the cold air because the velocity of the air traveling thru the MAF to throttle body pipe SLOWS down and the throttle body is only 2.5". Therefore the throttle body is unable to 'suck' air in effectively thru the filter to MAF piping because the MAF to throttle body has increased in size and air volume. It can only suck in so much air, but pushing it in will yield greater results. It is just sucking on the air which is present inside the 3" MAF to throttle body pipe, and not sucking the air from the cold air extension (MAF to filter pipe).

Restoring the MAF to throttle body pipe to its original 2.5", and the cold air intake is in full effect. Instead of the throttle body sucking on warm air present in the 3" MAF to throttle body pipe (warm air because there is not enough velocity to effectively 'cool' the pipe, and also the heat soaking effect from the engine'), the throttle body uses the velocity and relies on the piping AFTER the MAF which is cold air.


Experimentation

To experiment and prove my point, I got a 3" MAF to throttle body pipe, and used silicon couplers that were 2.5-3". After the MAF, there was a pipe leading down to the fender with filter. Temperature was 60 degrees F. Normal driving early in the morning, approximately 14 miles.

After the drive, I checked upon the temperature of the intake pipes. Despite the cold weather, the pipes were WARM (this was done using my hands only). The pipe after the MAF to filter was warm (it shouldn't have been) and the MAF to throttle body pipe was even warmer. I can only conclude one thing. That the velocity of the air was not fast enough to effectively 'cool' the intake, thus making it act like a semi-warm air intake.

After this, I put on a 2.5" piping from the MAF to throttle body, and kept the same 3" piping after the MAF to filter. Drove same way, temperature though was 70 degrees. Slightly warmer. Despite the warmer temperatures, the intake pipes were significantly COOLER than before. The MAF to filter pipe was all COOL, and the MAF to throttle body pipe was also cool. The intake manifold was barely warm. This shows that the ram-air effect works better having a 2.5" stock size pipe for the MAF to throttle body instead of a 3" pipe.





In conclusion, having a 2.5" piping effectively compresses the air, making the intake rely on the air piping from the MAF to filter, instead of relying on the 'stored' air inside the 3" piping from the MAF to throttle body. And you don't have to take my word for it, take HotShots word, or Mike Kojima on Sentra.net

I wrote this because I noticed some people (Place Racing, and other manfacturers that I am unaware of, EBAY) were using or have a 3" pipe. To utilize the effects of a cold air intake, the MAF to throttle body pipe MUST be 2.5", no bigger.
oliverr87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9th, 2006, 12:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
GA16DE200sx
Nissan Enthusiast
 
GA16DE200sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 88
Quote:
To utilize the effects of a cold air intake, the MAF to throttle body pipe MUST be 2.5", no bigger.
You had good points, but the main restriction is the cylinder head so it doesn't really make much of a difference. Good job though It was written out very well and made sense.

Last edited by GA16DE200sx : Feb 9th, 2006 at 12:11 PM.
GA16DE200sx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9th, 2006, 03:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
wes
Wise Cracker
 
wes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: new and improved
Posts: 5,599
Send a message via AIM to wes
Same shit as when HS and the Mike's did dyno. testing when the made the GA16 cold air intake...
__________________
www.NissanPerformanceMag.com
250+WHP GA16 Proudly sponsored by:
JWT
www.notnser.com
wes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9th, 2006, 08:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
RallyBob
Nissan Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the sticks of CT
Posts: 109
While 2.5" might be perfect for a stock engine application with bolt-ons, it does not address the potential that a modified engine has. So saying that 2.5" piping is the biggest you should run is somewhat of a blanket statement that does not hold true in all cases.

For example, IF you are running a ported head, higher compression pistons, a custom header and exhaust, an SR20 TB, and other modifications, then the 3" inlet pipe is the better choice.

The same holds true for exhaust systems, and while I've always been an advocate (if not the first) of the 'no bigger than 2 inch diameter' rule for the GA16 exhaust, I will be the first to admit that is not always the case, depending on the engine's specs and the applications. For N/A racing use, I actually use 2.25" tubing on the GA16 exhaust, even though I have adamently suggested otherwise in the past. But street and racing are two totally different things, regardless of how fast you think you drive on the street...

Bob
RallyBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10th, 2006, 10:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
oliverr87
Nissan Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 339
Send a message via AIM to oliverr87 Send a message via MSN to oliverr87 Send a message via Yahoo to oliverr87
Quote:
Originally Posted by RallyBob
While 2.5" might be perfect for a stock engine application with bolt-ons, it does not address the potential that a modified engine has. So saying that 2.5" piping is the biggest you should run is somewhat of a blanket statement that does not hold true in all cases.

For example, IF you are running a ported head, higher compression pistons, a custom header and exhaust, an SR20 TB, and other modifications, then the 3" inlet pipe is the better choice.


Bob

That's true, thank you for the clarification. The article only applies to stock and bolt-on mods. Of course serious modifications such as ported heads, cams, pistons, etc. would require a bigger inlet because simply the 2.5" inlet would be to a point where it would be restricting airflow. Thanks for the heads up!
oliverr87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NissanForums.com :: Nissan Forum > Nissan Models > Sentra, Pulsar, NX, B14 200SX > GA16DE 1.6L Engine



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q45 MAF swap bridrive55 General 240SX/Silvia/S12 200SX 3 Jan 29th, 2008 01:30 PM
Custom CAI, MAF placement jon_Gee SR-Series Engines (DE/VE) 4 Jun 28th, 2003 10:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
© 2006 NissanForums.Com