Google Links

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Go Back   NissanForums.com :: Nissan Forum > Technical > Forced Induction & Nitrous Oxide
Register Home Forum Gallery Active Topics Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Forced Induction & Nitrous Oxide Turbocharger, supercharger, and nitrous oxide information


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 2nd, 2002, 02:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
andre
Post Freak
 
andre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Queens, NY -> Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 1,386
Send a message via AIM to andre
Question Pros and cons of supercharging?

What are they. For one, I know that its less maintainance than turbo, but doesn't give as much power....please elaborate on the pros and cons.
__________________
Team Serious NYC
1.6L N/A.....3.0L Turbo no more.....
andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old May 2nd, 2002, 11:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
morepower2
Icy Hot Stunta
 
morepower2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cypress, Ca
Posts: 2,359
Re: Pros and cons of supercharging?

Quote:
Originally posted by andre
What are they. For one, I know that its less maintainance than turbo, but doesn't give as much power....please elaborate on the pros and cons.
They have much less efficent compressors, plus they have parasitic losses to turn the compressor by the crank.

The thing about them needing less maintanace than a turbo is not true either.
morepower2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2002, 04:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
andre
Post Freak
 
andre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Queens, NY -> Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 1,386
Send a message via AIM to andre
OK...I heard that as long as you give the engine good maintainance i.e. oil changes, that you shouldn't have trouble with the superchargers.....
And I heard that they're more efficient...meaning it doesn't take time spool like the turbo does.... Dont be afraid to elaborate.....I just want to educate myself a little on the subject.
__________________
Team Serious NYC
1.6L N/A.....3.0L Turbo no more.....
andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2002, 04:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
morepower2
Icy Hot Stunta
 
morepower2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cypress, Ca
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally posted by andre
OK...I heard that as long as you give the engine good maintainance i.e. oil changes, that you shouldn't have trouble with the superchargers.....
And I heard that they're more efficient...meaning it doesn't take time spool like the turbo does.... Dont be afraid to elaborate.....I just want to educate myself a little on the subject.

The adiabatic effieciency is worse meaning that if you figure out what the heating should be from just compressing the air via the ideal gas law, pv=nrt and what it acutaly is from the compressor, the turbo is more efficient and heats the air less while compressing it.

A roots supercharger is about 50-60% efficient and a centrifugal is around 60-70%.

A good turbo is from around 75-80%.

It equates to less charge heating, less work needed to compress the air with a turbo.

Mike
morepower2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2002, 10:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
ClassicSE-R
 
Posts: n/a
The advantage of a supercharger is that it is directly coupled to the engine, so that boost is coupled directly to your foot. In a turbo, there is a delay between cracking the throttle and getting boost.

A well matched turbo, however, will have very little lag, and for equivalent peak horsepower output, a turbocharged engine will make more power over the engine's entire operating range (if the turbo is matched properly).

Rob
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old May 2nd, 2002, 11:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
andre
Post Freak
 
andre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Queens, NY -> Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 1,386
Send a message via AIM to andre
OHhh..thanks...someone else had told me that it causes more heat in the engine...and you say that a good turbo is more efficient...but I dont want to get rid of my header, and change my exhaust again (got 2" piping...damn expensive strumong). Oh well, as long as I get the facts straight. Thanks.
__________________
Team Serious NYC
1.6L N/A.....3.0L Turbo no more.....
andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2002, 09:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
ClassicSE-R
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by andre
OHhh..thanks...someone else had told me that it causes more heat in the engine...and you say that a good turbo is more efficient...but I dont want to get rid of my header, and change my exhaust again (got 2" piping...damn expensive strumong). Oh well, as long as I get the facts straight. Thanks.
Turbochargers can increase exhaust gas temperatures more than superchargers do. They can also increase underhood tempeartures.

However, most supercharger systems aren't intercooled, and IMO that offsets any thermal advantages that a supercharger supposedly has. Consider that a roots-type supercharger running 10 psi of boost will have a 160 to 180 degree delta T. This means that your intake manifold temperature on an 85 degree day will be about 245-265 degrees F! A well matched turbocharger will only have about a 115-120 degree delta T, and then a decent intercooler will drop intake manifold temperatures down to the 115-130 degree F range.

Which engine do you think will have bigger thermal problems? The one with the 250 degree F intake manifold temperature (hotter than boiling water!), or the one with a 120 degree F intake manifold temperature? Which motor will be more likely to detonate? Which one will have to run more retarded ignition timing (further driving up EGT's)?

It is true that turbos introduce thermal issues, but a well designed turbo kit (like the F-Max kit for Sentras) and some decent thermal barrier coatings (like Swain's White Lightning or HPC) will keep temperatures down to a reasonable level.

Keep in mind that nobody makes a supercharger kit for your car, but there are turbo kits available. The pain of removing your header and exhaust won't be nearly as great as the pain of developing your own supercharger kit.
  Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2002, 01:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
andre
Post Freak
 
andre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Queens, NY -> Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 1,386
Send a message via AIM to andre
Quote:
Originally posted by ClassicSE-R


The pain of removing your header and exhaust won't be nearly as great as the pain of developing your own supercharger kit.
I hear ya....just exploring options. I guess I'll just continue with bolt'ons then go Nitrous.
__________________
Team Serious NYC
1.6L N/A.....3.0L Turbo no more.....
andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  NissanForums.com :: Nissan Forum > Technical > Forced Induction & Nitrous Oxide



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KA engine rebuild --NEED HELP ASAP please BobbyRay S13 240SX 1989-1994 20 Aug 16th, 2003 01:08 AM
Transmission Compatability semrz1 New Member Forum 5 Jun 25th, 2003 01:05 PM
Pros and Cons on Grand Prix SuperSentra4203 Off Topic 3 Apr 14th, 2003 11:22 AM
Pros and Cons about this Hip Hop group 94blackSER Off Topic 2 Jan 9th, 2003 03:16 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
© 2006 NissanForums.Com