|
Pablo14, you have a good point concerning the 2.0 engine. That is still a prized engine by enthusiasts and the B13 forum has proven that it could be improved marginally through aftermarket upgrades. Like you said, Nissan could\should have left the 2.0 as an option (i'm ok w\dropping the 1.6!). I'm reminded of the classic 1960's 289 V-8 available on the early mustangs. It was eventually replaced by heavier, more powerful engines. However, this power came at a price as these new engines proved less efficient and reliable. Mustang's downfall in the 1970s stemmed in part from re-designing a classic car to accomodate these chunky engines. Lee Iococa eventually came to this conclusion himself.
My point is that Nissan's light, efficient, and peppy 2.0 of years past perhaps should have been retained.
I certainly hope Nissan will revert to their "overquality" advocacy and continue to produce fine motor vehicles designed to run for generations. A tradition like theirs would be a terrible thing to waste.
__________________
ONWARD TO VICTORY!...or at least survival.
|